|
Name: Phil
E-mail:
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 10-20 years
Posted: 30 April 2013
Other, Non-Employee,
I'm guessing from reading your post that you're a company officer,
and drank the Kool-Aid from the CSX company fountain in Atlanta and
Jacksonville. CSX DOES NOT have diversity outside of Jacksonville or
Atlanta. The only place you'll find diversity is where Wall Street
and upper management will look.
CSX is a SOUTHERN COMPANY IN ALL FASCITIS. Look at the terms it
continues to use in the 21st century, and that other railroads have
chose NOT to use. Train MASTER, Yard MASTER, Road MASTER..... Instead
of updating the terms that are used for these positions, as other
railroads have done, CSX has decided to, and continues to use these
antiquated terms from the Civil War, and Slave and Master era.
This is the 21st century. I know this might come as a shock to some,
and contrary to want Great Lakes Division's own David Harris may
openly say about how the T&E field not being a job for women, today,
women are in the workforce. When you read the company produced
propaganda from both Jacksonville, or the local divisions, it STILL
refers to its employees in the male vernacular, even though women work
in the T&E field. On the Great Lakes Division is only ONE manager of
African American decent, and NO FEMALE MANAGERS. Until last year Avon
terminal's youngest female had 10 years seniority, and she was their
only female minority. To top this off, she'd transferred in from
another division.
So Other, Non Employee, I've worked out of many terminals on both the
Great Lakes, Nashville, and Chicago Division. I don't see women out
here, (not that my wife objects to this), and I don't see to many if
any minorities (afro American or Hispanic) out here. I don't know
where you're working out of CSX or who you know that is, but if you
ever visited terminals outside of Jacksonville's immediate view, you
would find that CSX is not the utopia that CSX paints for the media and
world to see.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 29 April 2013
This is so untrue and unfair to every RR employee that ever hired on.
Pure BS. Some RR hired only white males for certain jobs, and an
African american could get the same job at another RR. The exact same
thing happened when a white guy applied. The RR hired based on need, as
they do today, however they must have diversity today and that is a
problem. Simply hiring the best one that walks in the door, filling the
board and things are good is not good enough.-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Contrary to what CSX may say publicly, CSX management looks at all
women and minorities as a lawsuit waiting to happen. With this said,
CSX DOES NOT care about you, me, or anyone else. But CSX does care
about bad publicity. God Forbid anyone tarnish the image they falsely
propagate to the media and Wall Street about what a wonderful company
they are. I STRONGLY SUGGEST you spend the thirty dollars, join the
NAACP, and file a discrimination complaint with their legal address
committee. While I'm not sure what you were hoping to gain when you
filed your lawsuit, I'm sure this organization might be of some
assistance to you. No company wants to have their logo plastered
across the front page and leading the National News with the NAACP
saying THIS COMPANY DISCRIMINATES AGAINST PEOPLE OF COLOR.
Please give going this route some thought, and good luck.
View This Article |
|
Name: ===Todd Novac==
E-mail: ==shit bag .com==
Employed as: Yard Master, for 10-20 years
Posted: 28 April 2013
HE ===TODD NOVAC ==== boy the truth hurts maybe you should go back
to cooking !!!!! maybe you dipped one to many times in the secret sauce
!! or is that cum on you check from the train master . you have no
shame showing you face at work and we know what you realy think of your
fellow workers May a herd of monkeys shit on your head===== Fat boy====
View This Article |
|
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 26 April 2013
Joann,
I decided to take the time and look up if you were real person, or a
company plant on this site. I ran a google search using your name,
Joann Brooks, Jacksonville, and CSX, below is one of the links that
came up.
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flmdce/3:2009cv00379/226328/11
It looks like your case was dismissed back in 2009. While I applaud
your efforts, and am impressed that you were actually able to get the
EEOC to do something, then agree you did indeed have grounds to file a
suit against CSX, what are you hoping to gain now that your lawsuit has
been dismissed? How will it help you, and be of benefit to those of us
who agree to join and stand with you as you've asked, when your case
was dismissed several years ago?
I understand from reading the lawsuit you filed, you're an older
african american female that worked her way up the ranks and hurt your
back lifting a box of files. Have you thought about contacting your
local NAACP branch and filing a discrimination complaint with their
legal address committee? By filing a complaint with the NAACP's Legal
Address Committee, you are a voice of many, vs a voice of one.
Who out here doesn't agree, we all know, CSX DOES discriminate.
Contrary to what CSX may say publicly, CSX management looks at all
women and minorities as a lawsuit waiting to happen. With this said,
CSX DOES NOT care about you, me, or anyone else. But CSX does care
about bad publicity. God Forbid anyone tarnish the image they falsely
propagate to the media and Wall Street about what a wonderful company
they are. I STRONGLY SUGGEST you spend the thirty dollars, join the
NAACP, and file a discrimination complaint with their legal address
committee. While I'm not sure what you were hoping to gain when you
filed your lawsuit, I'm sure this organization might be of some
assistance to you. No company wants to have their logo plastered
across the front page and leading the National News with the NAACP
saying THIS COMPANY DISCRIMINATES AGAINST PEOPLE OF COLOR.
Please give going this route some thought, and good luck.
View This Article |
|
Name: ===Todd Novac===
E-mail: I suck a Dick .com
Employed as: Yard Master, for 10-20 years
Posted: 26 April 2013
=======Todd Novac ======= updates . he has made a complant to CSX about
harassment that this should be not talked about !!!!!! he claims he
only barrowed the money and as a union official he was allowed to do it
without breaking the law . LOOK at medina county criminal records . We
should all stand up against him Fuck the company And fuck the UTU for
letting him Back Fuck you ===Todd Novac
View This Article |
|
Name: ==Todd Novac==
E-mail: scumbag .com
Employed as: Yard Master, for 10-20 years
Posted: 24 April 2013
TODD NOVAC Yardmaster at Collinwood In at Cleveland ohio . Fat fuck
with a pumpkin head . stoled money from our union BLE and was found
guilty !!!!!!!! and the came back as a yardmaster .It shows how weak
are unions are !!!!! No one should even talk to him .what happened to
employee un becomining !!!! what a piece of fat shit!! I am sure he is
a snitch for the trainmaster . stand up against him he is no good !!!.
And also he stated I was going to pay it back . like they all do
!!!!!!!!!
View This Article |
|
Name: JoAnn Brooks
E-mail: royaltyreigns09@yahoo.com
Employed as: Corporate office, for 30+ years
Posted: 23 April 2013
RAILROADERS, PAST and PRESENT . . .
I have been reading your comments and there definitely must be
"CHANGE" within the Railroad System. I am a former CSX employee with
over thirty (30) years of experience. I have also taken advantage of
the educational reimbursement program, earned a Master's Degree,
Facilitated training programs for management and union employees. My
last position allowed me to work with the gentlemen in the field, SPG
and Maintenance of Way through the Human Resources Department in
Jacksonville, Florida. I am currently fighting in COURT against some
of the very things you are upset about . . . bullying . . . retaliation
. . . discrimination . . . unfair treatment . . . safety violations and
much more. . . . I really want to know how many of you would be willing
to rally . . . stand together and really let your voices be heard
without sounding uneducated and WIN back . . . what has been STOLEN
from US? Profanity may relieve the hurt and disbelief temporarily, but
not intelligently get your point heard . . . MONEY RECOVERED and JUSTICE
REIGN!!! WHAT SAY YOU??? Thanks JoAnn IS THE COURT SYSTEM
INEFFECTIVE? MY GOD ISN'T!! HE RULES . . . Again, WHAT SAY YOU? TIME
TO ACT NOW . . . LET ME HEAR FROM YOU . . .
View This Article |
|
Name: NoMo
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 22 April 2013
Hey APE 10-20:
Good point...the RCO's came to CSX in 2001 and were fully deployed
by 2003 with a two man crew.
The back issues will start hitting CSX anytime now...probably won't be
as bad as the asbestos suit but will cost the carriers billions!
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: APE, for 20-30 years
Posted: 22 April 2013
I would think that the RCO physical fitness issue is not the fact that
20 year old RCO's may have problems when they are 50, but that we have
newer RCO's who were hired in middle age and may not have the seniority
to escape to a better job before retirement AND - will not have full
retirement until age 70. Meaning we have 50 yr old new hires doing RCO
work now who will still be marching through poor walking conditions
with a heavy box when they are 65, unable to retire and even unable to
qualify for disability in some cases. Where do they go? How safe is
this? Can we foist our corporate mistakes off on RRB so ALL RR
employees can contribute to the $$$ by forcing theses folks into
disability at a lower pay rate? The RR was never setup with the idea
that 50 year old men could not perform the only job they could hold,
despite a good faith effort.There was always a less demanding
(physically) job they could hold, even if pays, hours, days off, etc.
were not optimal.Something to think about.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 20 April 2013
This is a nice post that has merit, and deserves a comment.
The Remote was not accepted by anyone, no one wanted it. It came from
the same place as FRED. It was forced into use by the carriers, they
bought it and are going to use it. This is when the fight starts,
simply because we have 2 unions that work together on the same
locomotive day after day and get their info from 2 different
directions. I saw that in the early 1960's ---when the Brakeman got
off of the locomotive it was fun on him time. We had Fireman that rode
a few miles and got off, it was the same again. We had Engineers that
hated all Brakemen until the Fireman left. We had Conductors that would
not board the locomotive if a certain Engineer was on duty.--
Now some of the real life BS that I posted above is still going on.
Time to roll those dues into something that works. RCO with 3 is a good
start, or fight the system with 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Retired FRA Inspector
E-mail:
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 12 April 2013
I just believe that remote control was bad for everyone, and that it
should have been opposed by both unions. This has been a big step
backward for railroad transportation employees. One employee is now
doing the work that was previously done by three. The young people may
be able to spend eight hours walking in ballast, over ties and
tripping
on debris, but how will they do it after 30 or 40 years. And they are
constantly carrying the extra weight of the remote control boxes.
Also,
from what those folks told me, they often must break rules in order to
meet production demands. And keep in mind how stringent the rules have
become. Technology usually makes work easier, but in this case, it has
had the opposite effect. Power stokers on steam locomotives is an
example of technology that was good for employees.
View This Article |
|
Name: I
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 18 April 2013
Looks like Stupid dodged a bullet this time. Done some damage to a
Locomotive a while back on the north end, denied all involvement to
management. Not to worry, Management knows about it now. Too bad your
own local chairman dimed you out. Nothing like the union brotherly
love.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 17 April 2013
yes I agree he needs to be got read of.
View This Article |
|
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Conductor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 17 April 2013
yes I know this is not professionalism, but it needs to be said FUCK
Frulla I'm glad the coal fields are finally sticking together and
putting csx in a bind with no one available.
View This Article |
|
Name:
E-mail:
Employed as: Corporate office, for 10-20 years
Posted: 16 April 2013
Crane just got Burrus's job. Maybe people can not be so uptight now
View This Article |
|
| | |