CSX-Sucks!

Harassment and Discrimination Racial Sexual Religious

(Fill in the blank)
All employees are treated             .

    This area of the site will be an open forum for CSX employees to discuss all forms of harassment and discrimination on the job. As many of us have seen, the company's first priority is the company, not the rights of it's workers.

    Coming soon... Audio Files of real employees being harassed and discriminated against.


Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Showing 1-20 of 6552 articles posted under "Harassment and Discrimination"

All 6552 articles on one big page.

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 20-30 years
Posted: 09 February 2016

Even if they were some how relieved of there duties, they would be given
a golden parachute and rewarded for failure.  Its the new American way.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: APE, for 20-30 years
Posted: 08 February 2016

I'm hearing Ward and Sanborn are fighting for their jobs right now. If
the investors want to see good to average results better show these two
the door. Employee morale is at an all time low so when this happens it
effects everything from results, efficiency, safety, and ethics. When
an employee is concerned about their job everyday where do you think
their mind is at? I expect an higher injury rate and more accidents to
occur in this climate. So go ahead and keep these two clown in, go
ahead and cut more jobs and close more terminals, service less
customers because of lack of manpower. If the investors keep these
people in they deserve the poor results they will get

  View This Article

Name: Cond
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 07 February 2016

Cond 1-10

Your being told total bullshit. If you have been forced off your road
position and all you can hold is a job in your yard or anywhere in your
terminal for that matter they have to train/qualify you with pay. They
are just trying to cut a fat hog. They don't want to fork out more
money to train people twice. This is not your fault and they don't
have the right to restrict your seniority just because they THINK
someone more senior might be coming in town.  Your local chairman
should know this and if he doesn't then he needs to step down and give
his seat to someone who knows the agreement. Don't take this shit.  If
you are sitting around not working because you cant hold any road jobs
and they are not putting you to work in your yard you put in a penalty
claim for everyday you are forced to sit and not earn a living. Your LC
should know the claim for this. If there is anyone junior to you that is
working you should be able to bump his position and train on his job.
Document every day he works and claim his wages. If it were me I would
claim lost wages for every guy working in your terminal that's junior
to you. They got this problem at avon yard with their remote jobs. Got
tons of junior guys working remotes that unqualified road conductors
can bump and demand training. DONT TAKE THIS SHIT FROM THE COMPANY.
They did this to a bunch of us when we were hired and they started
cutting us off. Yes, I had good LC and got most of my claim paid. Kept
calling junior men into work and skipping me.  Never called me.  Were
playing favorites games as usual.  I would give the article number to
file under for them restricting your seniority but its been years since
I've even looked at my old conductors agreement... Also, it an ethics
violation for them to discriminate against you. That exactly what it
is!  You have every right to make a living and be trained on a job to
protect your right to work in your terminal. They need to explain why
they are allowing any man with less seniority to work and refuse to
train you for the position and allow you to earn an income on the job.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 05 February 2016

Does anyone know the contract article that states the company has to
qualify you in your home terminal once forced off the road into the
yard? I was recently forced off the road, and I can hold  A few spots
in the yard. The crew management keeps telling me that all these other
conductors are coming from different terminal to the furlough. So they
won't qualify me because they say I won't be able to hold once these
conductor show up. But in the last month supposedly 10 were coming, and
only one has shown up. 

Apparently crew management has a new policy where they start a
spreadsheet with everyone's seniority on it, and they only pay the
people to qualify that can hold once it is all sorted out. But I'm in
my home terminal in him being denied qualification.

Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 20-30 years
Posted: 05 February 2016

Either way he is correct.  There really are too many side letters that
work against the actual agreements.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 20-30 years
Posted: 04 February 2016

Pretty sure: - Local Chairperson cannot make property\local
agreement(s) changes, etc., unless there is backing/support of a Gen.
Chairperson / Committee, who'd have the say-so.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Friend or family of employee, for 20-30 years
Posted: 04 February 2016

I ONCE SAW AN ARTICLE A FEW YEARS BACK FROM THE UNION STATING HOW WE
HAVE TO PRESERVE THE AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE.  SINCE THEN AGREEMENTS
HAVE CONTINUED TO BE GIVEN AWAY FOR NO REASON.  THEY SELLOUT THE
AGREEMENTS DURING CONTRACT TALKS TO KEEP THOSE BIG PAYING UNION JOBS. 
IN OTHER WORDS, SCREW THE MEMBERSHIP, ITS ALL ABOUT ME ME ME.

........................................................................................................................................................

One of the biggest problems;  many local chairman make  too many “Side
Letter of Agreements” with the carriers. I understand now, some CSX
divisions are paying only actual time on Dead Heads. That’s not the
national contract since 2004. Again, special agreements are made...why?

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 20-30 years
Posted: 04 February 2016

I MYSELF HAVE WATCHED OUR UNION LEADERS CONTINUE TO TURN A BLIND EYE TO
ALL THE PROBLEMS WE SEE TODAY.  

YEARS AGO IF A COMPANY OFFICIAL GAVE ME A HARD TIME, I WENT TO THE
UNION AND REPORTED THE GUY, IT STOPPED REAL FAST.  TODAY WHEN A COMPANY
OFFICIAL GIVES ME A HARD TIME, I REPORT HIM TO THE UNION AND THE REPLY I
GET IS....."THEY CAN DO THAT." "DO WHAT THE COMPANY WANTS."  THE
UNION DOESN'T REPRESENT AND FIGHT FOR YOU ANYMORE.  THEY ARE TOO BUSY
SPENDING YOUR MONEY AT CONVENTIONS GETTING DRUNK!

I ONCE SAW AN ARTICLE A FEW YEARS BACK FROM THE UNION STATING HOW WE
HAVE TO PRESERVE THE AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE.  SINCE THEN AGREEMENTS
HAVE CONTINUED TO BE GIVEN AWAY FOR NO REASON.  THEY SELLOUT THE
AGREEMENTS DURING CONTRACT TALKS TO KEEP THOSE BIG PAYING UNION JOBS. 
IN OTHER WORDS, SCREW THE MEMBERSHIP, ITS ALL ABOUT ME ME ME.

WE ALSO DON'T NEED TWO UNIONS!  WE NEED ONE UNION THAT ISN'T SO TOP
HEAVY.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: APE, for 1-10 years
Posted: 03 February 2016

Until now, never thought I would write to a forum like this. A friend
told me about it.

All is interesting.  Got over 8 yrs. in on the RR now after losing
decent prior jobs account different reasons I had no control of.

Was happy to get my 1st union job. My Dad said a union is only as
strong as it's membership.   Lots of constant complaining about the RR
& the union. Nothing ever seems to be appreciated.

Been around long enough to hear and see that a lot of workers are big
loudmouths -- talk the talk but don't walk the walk.  Is the same with
the RR.  Old heads with lots of time have told me that's the way its
always been.

Not a wonderful world by any means but at least I have a job, vacation,
plds, insurance, a retirement plan.  I have to keep at it.


Csx does suck.  Many things could be and should be better.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 30+ years
Posted: 03 February 2016

Union, friend / family, for yrs.,

RLA: Long, drawn out National Contract Negotiations, Section 6 Notices
(wish lists), penalty time claims, Arbitration, Mediation, etc.

LMRDA: UTU's Constitution contains instructions: - Charges & Trials of
Officers.  Should a member choose, he/she could hire a Labor Attorney
and/or deal with the US DOL if they feel they've been misrepresented.
Elect to become a dues objector.  Good luck with all/any of that.

90% of the time it's the RR I get upset with. No doubt, it'd be a
real nightmare working for a non-union csx.    Back to csx sucks.

  View This Article

Name: BuckWild
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 03 February 2016

Below poster who claimed that "Union Officials can be voted out"- well
why haven't they been voted out yet? More tough talk but nobody does
anything. I want to see some action not just the usual defense of the
Unions status quo. Taking reduced dues to hurt the Unions pocket books
and make them wake up doesn't seem a horrible idea don't see how it
will affect their already crappy handling of the companies. Nobody is
suggesting getting rid of the Unions but getting them back in shape.
And blindly supporting them 100% and making claims that somehow the
system will right itself with no action by the membership is hogwash.

  View This Article

Name: SP Engineer
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 02 February 2016

Speaking of union officers:

There cannot be a worse group than on the UP side in Colton, CA. The
General Chairman and his Local officer are the highest paid within the
entire union. The GC makes more that the International President and at
least $100,000.00 more than next highest paid GC with comparable
membership.
Here's the kicker; the GC was also collecting reserve board pay
inspite of the bylaws restrictions for full-time General Committee
officers.
The west coast terminal is a proving ground for the rail carrier's
agenda for undermining agreements...because the trail of payouts are
endless!

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 30+ years
Posted: 02 February 2016

The UnionsShouldWorkForYou & union democracy posters only got it
half-assed. = =  Must be co. moles/trolls or want-to-be.

Railroaders: References to the LMRDA should also include references to
the RLA, which was enacted long prior.

Unions perfect? Heck no.  Full time big-shots do just fine income &
benefit wise.  But they can be replaced, voted out.

RR companies are not employee friendly.  Are any companies really very
caring\friendly to workers?

Any member who rags on their union organization ought to do a term or
two as a local rep. - - that alone is a real ear & eye opening
education.
 

RRs would like nothing better than to have even weaker unions -
so everyone, please think hard & long about trying to become dues
objectors.

  View This Article

Name: UnionsShouldWorkForYou
E-mail: 
Employed as: Friend or family of employee, for 30+ years
Posted: 01 February 2016

Have the UTU/BLE Disappointed you AGAIN? Do you think they should be
fighting for your benefits/rights as an employee, not giving away
everything at each contract? Do you feel that even if we cant "get
something better" at each contract then the Unions should just
maintain what we have instead of trading it away for small, taxable
"bonuses"? Do you think the Union Leadership is working for THEIR
best interests, not yours (which is why the BLE/UTU merger never
happened!)? Do you feel YOU have NO POWER against this??!! NO, NO, NO!!
YOU HAVE POWER!!! You might ask, "well I am forced to be in the Union
even if I don't want to be and/or they aren't a strong- member
focused Union anymore".......it is true, the Rail Labor Act keeps
railroaders in Unions and you have no choice about joining- HOWEVER YOU
have the RIGHT to REFUSE to pay all of your hard earned paycheck to
these increasingly corrupt rail Unions and their backroom deals and
disrespect of their membership. That's right, you can become what's
called a "non-consenting member". This means you refuse to
participate in the Union(s) as a full dues paying member, instead you
are put on their books as being in the Union but only pay a small
portion of dues that are related to the collective bargaining
agreement. All of the MAJORITY of the dues which go to lobbying,
political functions, paying leadership etc.- will not be charged to
you. Actually dues drop to the range of $12-$25/mo. Now you cant vote
on the contracts, cant go to meetings, cant use any "benefits" and
cant do pretty much anything with the Union. By LAW they are still to
defend you if you get in trouble/discipline. Why am I telling you all
of this? Not to destroy Unions or tell you not to want to be in one,
but to PROTEST the Unions behavior and effect a change in them. Money
is the only thing that gets people like these to respond to our demands
and cutting off their flow will wake them up. If entire
locations/workplaces all did this at the same time it would send a
message surely. This is almost like striking on the Union itself, only
with its money (dues). Will this type of action be harsh? Absolutely.
Will some people call participators "traitors" and "Union haters"?
100% likely! But when people stand around and do nothing to defend
themselves, they will be stripped of their lives and liberty  surely.
Please consider protesting the Unions anti-membership behaviors and
become "Non-consenting Members" to make them realize OUR voice the
MEMBERS are who they answer to! The Unions are required to post your
right to do this action, they usually put it in a small blurb once a
year in their newsletters/magazines. They claim you can only put an
application in once a year to do this but you have the right to do it
anytime you like, there has been upheld legal precedents for it

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 30+ years
Posted: 29 January 2016

Just trying to keep pace with nitwit idiot engineer posts.

  View This Article


Buy the webmaster a beer! Or a coffee!
Or a book! Or send cash!
Help keep this site alive!
 

www.CSX-Sucks.com - Sticking it to the man since 2001

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 20-30 years
Posted: 29 January 2016

Why do you idiots keep posting the same blog in every section?

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 30+ years
Posted: 29 January 2016

Conductor, 1-10 yrs.:

Dissatisfied with the UTU as a member?  Switch, join the ble-little T.
That outfit can handle\solve all your present & future issues and
problems.   NOT!  

----------------------------------------------------------------

APE:  

Unions exist because politicians still allow them.  Consider what it'd
be like with a totally conservative republican government, no union
representation at all.  Everyone is entitled to their opinion(s) but
try to think more open mindedly & not post what very many believe are
totally ignorant foolish words.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 28 January 2016

UTU has no backbone!!! And CSX employees are forced to pay them for
nothing. All they have done is loose jobs, loose bonuses, loose demand
days, and loose stock shares for there employees. Keep up the terrible
job UTU. UTU will probably have robots running trains by the end of the
year.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: APE, for 30+ years
Posted: 28 January 2016

If any railroader votes for a Democrat you deserve what you get..Fuck
the UTU and the Democrats..especially the one in DC.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Friend or family of employee, for N/A
Posted: 27 January 2016

Union Pacific Board of Directors will hold an emergency meeting in order
to lure Canadian National's CEO (Claude Mongeau) into running the Union
Pacific after a possible merger.
Canadian National is the only railroad that had sustained profits in
spite of the difficult head winds!

  View This Article

Next
www.CSX-Sucks.com
don't click here