CSX-Sucks!

Safety First

Rule #1 -- Don't get hurt.

    Safety is the first priority. Er, or is it the second, after money.... Or the third after getting the trains out....



Showing 1-20 of 15323 articles posted under "Safety First?"

All 15323 articles on one big page.

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 09 September 2010

Hey RRJ:

CSX doesn't want to pay claims and the unions don't want to handle
them so why don't the unions and CSX agree to a buyout of the claims?

CSX and the unions would save millions in not having to handle the
claims and the men would get a nice little bump in their rate. Since
there were no more penalty claims there would be no more finagling on
the moves to generate them, not that I ever did that. Everything should
become more efficient saving additional time and money.

Seems pretty straight forward to me...I wonder why CSX or the unions
haven't thought of it?

  View This Article

Name: RRJ
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 09 September 2010

NoMo

It's real simple CSX and the unions did away with run-around claims.
I'd been rested and had crews run around me going back on a short turn
service. CSX response a train was ready and they didn't want to hold it
for a two hour call. It only added more hours on to our stay. If they
had a train ready why didn't they call us? Never got an intelligent
response from any TM. It's a power issue they can do it because they
can. No more penalty claims. People want to know why claims are denied
it's because the authority to approve claims by local management was
taken away everything goes thru JAX. That has been going on for the
past 2 years. Up until that point I was getting claims paid at least
those that a TM authorized. All one can do today is file get it denied
then forward it to the LC for handling. Got an email the other day on
claims paid at a claims conference out of a couple hundred 17 were paid
about 34 forwarded for further handling the rest were schidt canned. The
list keeps getting smaller.

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 08 September 2010

The UTU web site had a link on their home page to the memorial for the
fallen Brothers and Sisters...where did it go?

I guess registering voters and Mike's spiel about how much better the
UTU is now that he's in charge trump the deaths of the fallen!

What a class act!

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 08 September 2010

2 UTU members die in separate accidents
 
Two UTU members have died in separate on-duty rail accidents over the
Labor Day period in Mobile, Ala., and near the southern New Jersey town
of Paulsboro, a suburb of Philadelphia.

These two on-duty fatalities bring rail-employee on-duty fatalities for
2010 to 13, which is three more than the 10 reported on-duty fatalities
for all of 2009; and bring UTU-member on-duty rail fatalities to eight
for 2010, which is equal the 12-month total in 2009.

In Mobile, conductor Josh Roper, 27, died in an accident Saturday,
Sept. 4, at McDuffie Coal Terminal while working a conventional
switching job with Alabama State Docks Terminal Railroad. He had been
furloughed by CSX before hiring on with the state-owned railroad. Roper
was member of UTU Local 598. He is survived by his wife, Cassie, and
two-year-old daughter. 

The Mobile Press-Register newspaper reported that there were no
witnesses to the accident. The newspaper reported that when
"co-workers found [Roper], they said it appeared he had been struck by
a railcar." The accident is being investigated by the Federal Railroad
Administration.

Near Paulsboro, N.J., a Conrail Shared Assets conductor and member of
UTU Local 1390 died Thursday, Sept. 2, during what FRA investigators
report was a two-man conventional switching move into an industrial
facility. The FRA said the move was observed by a surveillance camera
"seconds before impact." The name of the deceased, reportedly 57
years old, has not been released.

A third on-duty rail fatality occurred Wednesday, Sept. 1, near
Minneapolis, when a BNSF maintenance worker -- not a UTU member -- was
struck by a Northstar commuter train.

The UTU participates in the Switching Operations Fatalities Analysis
(SOFA) working group, a coordinated effort with the FRA, carriers and
labor organizations to develop safe practices that reduce fatalities
and career ending injuries in yard switching operations.

To learn more about SOFA safe practices, go to www.utu.org and click on
the "Transportation Safety Link" in the blue tile box on the left. 

That link also provides information on UTU Transportation Safety Team,
which assists the National Transportation Safety Board in accident
investigation; and the UTU Rail Safety Task Force, which works with
general chairpersons, state legislative directors, local officers and
members to develop safe practices and techniques to improve -- and keep
at its highest level -- situational awareness in yard and road
operations.
 
September 7, 2010

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 07 September 2010

Hey Kyle:

TMI...I bet most of the men got Crabs, kinda hard to explain that to
their wives. I'm surprised the Trainmasters weren't making short arm
inspections;)

  View This Article

Name: kyle
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 20-30 years
Posted: 06 September 2010

You younger dudes should be glad that we are now put up away from home
in hotels & motels as when i hired on they the rr still had a few of
those old YMCA bunk houses which were just like a army bootcamp
barracks from ww-2, The sleeping quarters had like 50 bunks and the
only thing between the bunks was a cloth curtain and two of did not
even have AC So you can just imagine the noise & awfull oders that
reeked out of those places,Then the big lavatorys, 20 tolilets & sinks
all lined up real nice and you could smell it before you even walked in
there plus the shower rooms which had about 20 shower heads, ie no
privacy period!! I re-call getting a bad case of atheletes foot in one
of those shower dumps, And then the canteens they in those ymca,s,The
stuff they cooked was not fit for anaimals,Some guys would not even
stay in those places as some would have a 2nd car they kept at the away
from home terminals and would drive 200 miles or more back to their
homes,,Its sort of strange as i too had a 2nd car, ie i wised up but
every time i would go home from the away from home terminal i would get
called out in 8 hrs but if i stayed at the Y then i would sit there and
rot for 40+ hours in the company hell hole, All i got to say those
YMCA,S sucked and was very happy when they closed all those rat holes.

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 06 September 2010

Hey Con 1-10:

6-10 hours...I've been held away for 56 hours and was 3x out when I
put off. I was working a pool turn and got run around by men with
windows slots.

Might not been so bad had CSX paid the run around claims. Finally
called the Chief Dispatcher and told her to call a van or run a train.
They ran one that had been sitting for 2 days. The Trainmaster
was pissed that I forced him to call a crew.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 1-10 years
Posted: 05 September 2010

It's unbelievable how ridiculous company officials are in this company.
They put you in the hotel for rest, which I have no problem with, and
hold you there for 6-10 hours after you are rested. What is the point
of taking rest in this case? The chief dispatcher should have the
foresight to realize crews cannot possibly be rested if they are
staying in the hotel for so long. Defeats the purpose of the new FRA
law when this kind of behavior is allowed by our company officials. I
generally keep my complaints to myself as they are trivial, but when is
CSX gonna crack down on Chief dispatchers and trainmasters that
constantly abuse their positions and employees.

  View This Article

Name: 
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for Less than 1 year
Posted: 02 September 2010

man, I am so glad to be out of this hell hole!!!  Everyone is looking
out for number one!!!  I was there for 4 years and read between the
lines!!!!  I saw my furlough coming but needed the benefits!!!  So I
beat them to the punch and went out disability (with benefits) and
received a job JUST before the benefits went out.  The sad part, the
union official was more pissed at me than the damn company officials!! 
I wonder why that is??  Could it be because I gave (and most on here
still do) over $100.00 a month to a bunch of low life fags who were in
the companies left hand pocket who only know how to say "they can do
that, they can do that, they can do that. But hey, thanks for your
charity to the waterhead (aka, UTU & BLE) union.  We appreciate you
WAISTING your money!!"  The funny part is just that, I CAN LAUGH IN
YOUR
FACES!!!!!LLLLLLLLLMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 But hey, I love the UTU news letters I still get.  Keep them coming,
they make wonderful fire starters for winter!!!!!LMAO  The federal
gov't is the way to go people!!!

  View This Article

Name: Madman
E-mail: 
Employed as: M of W, for 20-30 years
Posted: 01 September 2010

I received this from a friend of mine and it's very interesting in
opening doors around this shit hole!


Dear Amtrak Committee Member,

The following is provided as information. Twofold evidence that; 1)
laws protecting rail workers are changing, and 2) Amtrak remains
consistently oppressive. 


Amtrak Employee Awarded $160K in 'Historic' FRSA Case
Aug 31, 2010

An Amtrak coach cleaner has been awarded substantial damages for
retaliation by her employer for reporting an on-the-job ankle sprain.
The U.S. Department of Labor ordered Amtrak to pay Nicole Anderson, a
Seattle, Washington Amtrak employee, $60,000 in compensatory damages
and $100,000 in punitive damages in a decision issued last week.

Amtrak terminated Anderson's employment in November 2007 after she
reported to her manager that she had sprained her ankle while working
at Amtrak's King Street Station facility. While Amtrak claimed it
fired Anderson for failing to exercise common sense, Administrative Law
Judge Steven B. Berlin concluded otherwise, finding that Anderson
established at trial that Amtrak retaliated against her in violation of
the Federal Railroad Safety Act for reporting her work-related injury.

Explaining the $100,000 punitive damages award, the judge wrote,
"Amtrak's conduct reflects a degree of conscious disregard for how
its practices obstruct Congress's mandate in the Federal Rail Safety
Act. Punitive damages are appropriate to correct and deter this
conduct."

OSHA launched an investigation into the matter after one of Anderson's
co-workers reported Amtrak's action to the agency's Seattle regional
office. Amtrak reduced its discipline of Anderson from termination to a
30-day suspension without pay while OSHA's investigation was pending.
Following a thorough investigation, OSHA concluded in October 2008 that
Amtrak terminated Anderson in retaliation for reporting her ankle
sprain, and ordered the railroad to pay the worker her lost wages,
expunge her employment file, and to pay her $20,000 in punitive damages
for its illegal conduct. Anderson returned to work at Amtrak in January
2008, where she still works today.

Amtrak appealed OSHA's decision to the DOL's Office of Administrative
Law Judges, and that appeal culminated in a trial de novo before Judge
Berlin in June 2009. Attorney Fredric A. Bremseth represented Anderson
at trial. This was the first case to be tried under a 2007 amendment to
the Federal Railroad Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. §20109, that makes it illegal
for railroads to retaliate against employees who report work-related
injuries.

As the result of Amtrak's illegal conduct, Judge Berlin ordered the
railroad to:
     
Expunge Anderson's personal file of any disciplinary record or
negative references related to her Oct. 1, 2007 injury accident;
Amend its disciplinary records to show no more than a verbal warning in
connection with Anderson's late arrival at a safety meeting and expunge
the four-day suspension without pay that Amtrak imposed for that
incident;
Pay Anderson back pay in the amount of $2,666.67, plus interest from
the date of termination until the date of payment at the rate
prescribed by law;
Pay Anderson $60,000 in punitive compensatory damages;
Pay Anderson $100,000 in punitive damages; and
Pay Anderson for her attorneys' fee and costs.

"This is an historic case," Bremseth said, "that vindicates
Congressional findings that railroads do in fact engage in retaliation
and harassment of injured employees in order to keep them from
reporting work-related injuries." The attorney added, "We are very
pleased for our client, and hope this landmark case will put railroads
on notice that they can no longer intimidate their employees to keep
them from reporting on-the-job injuries."

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 01 September 2010

Hay Dave:

Perhaps the FRA should take a hint!

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GULF_OIL_SPILL_REVOLVING_DOOR?SITE=PAREA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

  View This Article

Name: RRJ
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 01 September 2010

The railroad isn't for everyone never has been never will be. I don't
know if I would of stayed with it if I hired out today. Then again what
it once was wouldn't of affected me only what it has become. A person
assimulates to there enviroment or doesn't. I admire those that leave
people shouldn't stay at jobs they don't like even in a down turn
economy. To the last poster the federal goverment is job security
almost recession proof unlike state, county, and city goverment jobs.
Funny someone should quote a person who only stayed 10 weeks which is
not enough time to form an opinion the person only took the option to
leave which is common among new hires. No one will miss him. How can
anyone take someone seriously that made it only 2 weeks out of the REDI
center. There are hundreds maybe thousands out there waiting as
replacements. When people get hungry enough they will be greatful for
work. Not a lot of choices today the railroad is still good money.

  View This Article

Name: Chris Leabetter
E-mail: cleabetter@gmail.com
Employed as: Brakeman, for 1-10 years
Posted: 31 August 2010

"IF YOU ARE NOT DESPERATE FOR A JOB AND HAVE EDUCATION, DO YOURSELF A
FAVOR AND TRY TO GET A JOB ELSEWHERE. FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT IS THE WAY TO
GO. THAT'S JUST MY OPINION. I SHOULD HAVE QUIT CSX MY SECOND DAY ON
THE JOB, BUT I STUCK IT OUT FOR TEN WEEKS UNTIL I COULDN'T TAKE THEIR
BULLSHIT ANYMORE. UNSAFE, UNFAIR, RATS AND SCABS............"

God Bless the mans heart who said this!!!!!!  I am so glad the railroad
is a distant memory!!!  I have been out for 3 years and working for the
Fed Gov't ever since.  Seeing my family more and getting treated well
by my management, I feel like a human again.  I felt like I did
something bad and was assigned to community service, except I received
pay for it while I was in the RR.

  View This Article


Buy the webmaster a beer! Or a coffee!
Or a book! Or send cash!
Help keep this site alive!
 

www.CSX-Sucks.com - Sticking it to the man since 2001

Name: RRJ
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 31 August 2010

Retraction: The "99ers" collected unemployment for 99 weeks not
months. Big difference.

  View This Article

Name: RRJ
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 30 August 2010

Dave 

You had me up in till the mention of blaming drivers for crossing
accidents. Unlike you I witnessed driver carelessness every trip. I'll
agree there is a minuit percentage of crossing system failure accidents
but it's not as high as you would like to make it. I know one is to
many. Your right it's considered part of the equation for big
business. That is just the way things have been since the beginings of
mankind. 

I unfortunately had to go to Ohio the past 4 days. What a bunch of
angry people. My sisters boyfriend used that expression when I asked
about what I noticed. Ohio & Michigan for nearly 60 years had the
luxory of those high paying union jobs which are no longer there and
the people are angry. The economy is in the crapper road work that was
being done 11 months ago on my last visit wasn't completed no funds in
the state coffers. So, the people go to their corner bar for cheap
alcohol and vent out their frustrations. Terms like give me a shot of
recession proof Jim Beam which was a half shot. No sympathy from me if
people want to sit on their arses and do nothing. I take it most are
the "99ers" a new political group who collected unemployment for 99
months till they were cut off. I guess that term made them feel better
then saying they were on welfare. Heck the 99ers even protested in Wash
DC for more extended benefits. Different world different generation from
where I came. The cry babies will vent at the current administrations in
DC this mid term elections just to find out neither party really gives a
crap. It's all about big business and those without jobs are just part
of the equation just like crossing accidents.

  View This Article

Name: NoMo
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 30 August 2010

Hey Dave:

Most of the complaints you hear are about things handled at the Local
an General Committee levels. 

Unfortunately, the complaints you read about are pay disputes and
attendance handling. International sits in Cleveland and gets involved
in big political issues like safety...crossing incidents certainly
qualify. They can pound their chest and talk tough but in reality
they're just a mouse that roars. 

Over the last two years there have been at least 4 fatalities on the
CSX attributed to Remote Control Operations and there's no telling how
many on the other carriers. Several of these were peg leg jobs.
To date the only thing the UTU has done, as far as I know, is write
letters and tell the membership they will take care of them.

Fatigue was another issue they handled with a new HOS law. Never worked
under it but judging from the posts I've read, No body has 
said anything good about it. In fact, it has led to a new attendance 
policy which no one likes.

I hope the employees take you up on your offer to help. It's time
the FRA, Union and carriers hands is called on this important safety
issue...especially with the advent of HSR. I would think the employees
have a vested interest and would think about their families...one of
them might be next!

  View This Article


Buy the webmaster a beer! Or a coffee!
Or a book! Or send cash!
Help keep this site alive!
 

www.CSX-Sucks.com - Sticking it to the man since 2001

Name: Dave
E-mail: 
Employed as: Other, non-employee, for N/A
Posted: 29 August 2010

NoMo

The UTU attorney I was working with was very sharp and unlike what I
have heard about the UTU, they are very concerned about the welfare of
it's members.
I was late getting to Washington and we had very little time to discuss
issues. Much of the information I needed to hammer the FRA came to me
later. Maybe I can discuss how the FRA is used to point the blame on
train crews in the same manner as drivers at crossing accidents a
little later. I think you'll be amazed as I was.

To answer your question: I did discuss railroads endangering you guys
with the attorney. This may be the reason for the UTU posting the
article on crossing accidents. Let me take a wild shot at it.
The UTU legal department his sort of like any other.  In order for them
to act, they must first have complaints or requests from their
membership. The UTU has to account for monies allocated for research,
investigations, etc.. They would have to set up a budget.,
Seems to me, the UTU posted the article saying " Is the membership
having problems, being endangered by signals?  If so, file complaints
and we'll act." 
I am willing to help in anyway I can IF it's GODS will. I certainly
don't want to get into any more boxing matches with GOD, my arms are
too short. I am 100% positive that the FRA has been corrupted and
serves to investigate and report all railroad accidents and poor safety
as being human error of train crews and drivers. However, as you can
imagine, taking on both railroads and government is no easy task,
especially when government is in the middle of providing billions of
dollars to railroads for High Speed Rail, Not to mention Mid Term
Ellections and a fight for political power. Employees and the public
killed as a result of the FRA and railroad actions are simply a cost of
"doing business." Let me know if I can help, I'll take it as a divine
aproval until proven otherwise by getting my brains beat in.

  View This Article

Name: KYLE
E-mail: 
Employed as: Conductor, for 10-20 years
Posted: 29 August 2010

The rr management has always made bad insights as to rr operations as
that was going on over 20 yrs ago when i hired on, But i must admitt it
has got worse not better in the past 20+ years and i do put a lot of
blame on those morons in the IVORY TOWER as they are the ones who are
putting these kids right out of colledge into the field were they know
not one dam thing about how a rr should operate, Its the SOS if it
works on paper it works in the field and don,t forget when these kids
are in colledge taking up a degree in transportation, They are told
over & over that the union workers are the enemy who will try and put
the screws to the company at any chance they get in order to make more
money for less work with more time off, Seems it gets worse with every
merger too,,Hell i had one new TM right out of colledge and that dummy
did not even know that a engine has angle cocks on both ends and these
are the kinds of people that managment puts out in the field,,YIKES!!!
Then they wonder why on time preformance is so bad today, But they have
the answer for that all the time, Its all the fault of the crews in
every dept.

  View This Article

Name: slack action
E-mail: 
Employed as: M of W, for 10-20 years
Posted: 28 August 2010

RE: love/hate engr..

I do not know what you are talking about T & E being the only ones
being accountable. M of W is accountable for every piece of track. 
Dispr are scutinized for every move they make and can be charged for
delaying a train, missing a slow order or crossing protection etc.  I
have the FRA breathing down my neck just about every other week...I
think you might want to reconsider that statement...

  View This Article


Buy the webmaster a beer! Or a coffee!
Or a book! Or send cash!
Help keep this site alive!
 

www.CSX-Sucks.com - Sticking it to the man since 2001

Name: Love/Hate
E-mail: 
Employed as: Locomotive Engineer, for 30+ years
Posted: 28 August 2010

CSX wants to hold train crews accountable for everthing but mech dept,
signal, track  and most of all piss poor managers and train disp are
not held accountable for anything I show up for work with the intention
of safely getting the job done proffesionally and going home. We are no
longer encouraged to make responsible decisions based on years of
experience.  We are no longer trusted at all and the important
decisions are left to 20 something children with college degrees in
whatever. They have little to no people skills and no practicle
experience. I have seen so many stupid decisions made and we train
crews are blamed for their bad decisions.

How much more money is csx willing to lose? how many more customers are
going to leave?

Empower your Qualified and experienced employees and let the little
college boys and girls manage fast food joints where they can make
their responsible decisions without costing us BIG busines.

I love my job. untie my hands, tell the worthless children managers to
back away. Hold everyone accountable for their descisions and the lack
thereof and watch us turn this cluster**** of a company into something
special

  View This Article

Next
www.CSX-Sucks.com
don't click here